← the 2026-10-15 wrap
SPY · 2026-10-15 · 24 hours change

FICO

Fair Isaac Corporation

covered 20 times →
+6.99%
Neutral
Catalyst

No confirmed news drove the 6.99% October 15 gain to $769.93; TipRanks cites easing fears over mortgage credit scoring.

Fair Isaac Corporation sells analytics software through two segments: Scores, which provides business-to-business credit scoring and myFICO.com consumer subscriptions, and Software, which provides decision management tools.

Price history

PriceS&P 500 (indexed)

Key facts

Close, 2026-10-15
$769.93
1-session move
+6.99%
from $719.63
Session range
$729.46 – $770.84
open $733.50
Volume
773k
1.1× 50-day avg
52-week range
$586.05close $769.93, 14% of the range$1,858.91
50-day avg
$942.84
200-day avg
$1,171.72
Market cap
$16.63bn
Forward P/E
15.4×
Dividend yield
0.00%
Year to date
-53.15%
Next earnings
2026-11-04
EPS est. 10.9
Same period · Application Software
  • S&P 500 +0.33%
  • PLTR -0.23%
  • ORCL +3.00%
  • CRM +4.57%
  • SNPS -2.46%
  • ADBE +4.57%
  • INTU +6.36%

Market data from Yahoo Finance at the 2026-10-15 close, computed by the site, not the AI.

Analyst Report: FICO

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Fair Isaac rose 6.99% to $769.93 on Thursday October 15, 2026, but the research brief establishes no clear catalyst for that session. The only readable source, an auto-generated TipRanks piece, describes a relief rally on easing fears around mortgage credit scoring and cites the United Wholesale Mortgage endorsement of FICO Scores, which broke on October 12 and drove that day's 10.85% gain. The stock has swung hard since the FHFA decision to use VantageScore alongside Classic FICO for mortgage pricing, and it remains 53.15% lower year to date. At 15.4 times forward earnings, the shares trade far below their earlier levels, and the next test comes with earnings on November 4 (one source says November 11, so the date needs confirming).

2. THE CATALYST

The brief attributes the October 15 rally to nothing that happened on October 15. TipRanks (2026-10-15) points to easing fears around the mortgage scoring market, the UWM endorsement, Raymond James keeping its Outperform rating, and a planned workforce cut of about 15%. The UWM news is dated October 12 (Koala Gains and StocksToTrade, 2026-10-12), so it explains Monday's move and carries little weight for Thursday. The workforce reduction is sourced only to Timothy Sykes (Cabot / Sykes, 2026-10-12) and TipRanks, with no company release found. Volume on October 15 was 773,000 shares, 1.08x the 50-session average, which gives no sign of a news-driven surge in trading.

The background for the volatility is the FHFA decision to use VantageScore alongside Classic FICO for mortgage pricing, which hit the stock on September 29 (Trefis, 2026-10-13). Fannie Mae said the updated credit score pricing adjustments apply to whole loans purchased on or after October 1, 2026 (Fannie Mae, 2026-09-30).

SessionCloseChangeSourced explanation
Oct 9$667.58-5.63%None found
Oct 12$740.00+10.85%UWM keeps FICO Scores on broker credit pulls and adds FICO Score 10T (Koala Gains, StocksToTrade)
Oct 13$723.03-2.29%None found; analyst target cuts the same day
Oct 14$719.63-0.47%None found
Oct 15$769.93+6.99%Unexplained; TipRanks cites easing fears

3. COMPANY PROFILE

Fair Isaac Corporation sells analytics software through two segments. Scores provides business-to-business credit scoring and the myFICO.com consumer subscriptions, and Software provides decision management tools. It sits in application software, and its market cap is $16.63bn.

For fiscal Q3 2026, reported July 29, Soji Spotlight reports revenue up 26% to $674.2 million and GAAP earnings per share up 41% to $10.45, with full-year guidance raised. Defense World reports $12.18 against a $11.76 consensus, probably an adjusted figure, though the brief could not confirm the basis. Trefis (2026-10-13) says Scores brought in $459 million of the total, and mortgage origination scores made up 62% of Scores revenue. Mortgage score revenue rose 97% year on year while the number of mortgage scores sold grew only in the low single digits, so price per score drove the growth. That price dependence explains why a rival score on equal footing for mortgage pricing worries investors.

4. DEEP DIVE ANALYSIS

The fundamentals through July were strong, and the sell-off reflects the risk to future mortgage score pricing and volumes. Management said on the July 29 call that it saw no volume loss but that tracking one is hard (Trefis, 2026-10-13). Fiscal Q4 covers only the period through September, so it will mostly predate the pricing change, and analysts will watch mortgage score volumes in later quarters (Trefis, 2026-10-13).

Analysts have cut targets sharply while mostly keeping positive ratings:

BrokerNew targetPriorRating
Needham (Oct 13)$1,100$1,650Buy
Raymond James (Oct 13)$1,230$1,750Outperform
Deutsche Bank (Oct 6)$744$1,658Buy
BMO (Sep 30; date conflicts)$1,150$1,550Outperform
Bank of America (Sep 30)$700$1,400Downgrade to Neutral
Barclays (Oct 2)$875$935Overweight

MarketBeat puts the average target at $1,143.50 in one report and $1,176 in another. Zacks Research moved to Strong Sell (Defense World, 2026-10-07), a quant rating. The Deutsche Bank target of $744 sits below the latest close of $769.93, and the Bank of America target of $700 is lower still.

On peers, application software names were mixed over the period: INTU +6.36%, CRM +4.57%, ADBE +4.57%, ORCL +3.00%, PLTR -0.23% and SNPS -2.46%, against the S&P 500 at +0.33%. Several software peers rose on the day, so part of FICO's move may reflect sector buying (inference). The brief lists Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac among top one-day gainers on a Trefis list but gives no cause.

Bull case: UWM's commitment shows lenders still want FICO Scores, FICO Score 10T is approved by the GSEs though not yet accepted for delivery (Fannie Mae FAQ, July 2026), the forward multiple is low, and brokers keep targets far above the price. A 15% workforce cut, if confirmed, lowers costs.

Bear case: The pricing change is in force, volume loss is hard to measure, and much of the recent revenue growth came from price. Whipsaw moves of -5.63% and +10.85% in consecutive sessions show how thin conviction is.

5. TECHNICAL SNAPSHOT

The close of $769.93 is the highest in the ten-session table, so no nearby resistance level appears in the closes. It sits well below the 50-day average of $942.84 and the 200-day average of $1,171.72, and the 52-week high of $1,858.91 dates from December 12, 2025. The stock has gained 8.83% in five sessions but is down 20.32% over twenty. Volume of 773,000 was near average and well below the 2,003,600 shares traded on October 12, so Thursday's rally came on lighter participation than Monday's.

6. RISK FACTORS

  • Mortgage score volume may fall as lenders adopt VantageScore, and the effect will appear only in later quarters.
  • The unexplained October 15 rally has no confirmed news behind it and can reverse.
  • The workforce cut lacks a company release.
  • Deutsche Bank flagged headwinds for information services stocks ahead of Q3 earnings season (title only, 2026-10-14).
  • GSE acceptance of FICO Score 10T for delivery remains planned, with no date.

Upcoming: earnings on November 4, 2026 per the facts (EPS estimate 10.9, revenue estimate $658.10m); one source says November 11 (Ad-hoc News citing Investing.com, 2026-10-14).

7. ACTIONABLE OUTLOOK

Short term (1-2 weeks): With no confirmed catalyst for Thursday, price action follows headlines on mortgage scoring and sector flows. Recent daily swings of 5% to 11% suggest wide ranges continue (inference). A hold above the $740.00 close of October 12 would mark a firmer base, and a drop toward $719.63 would show the rally fading.

Medium term (1-3 months): The November earnings report is the first evidence on volumes and guidance, though fiscal Q4 mostly predates the pricing change. Management commentary on mortgage score volume and the restructuring will drive the direction.

Long term: The thesis of pricing power in credit scores faces a new test from VantageScore's parity in mortgage pricing. Nothing in the brief confirms lasting volume loss, so the thesis is under review rather than broken. This is analysis, not personal financial advice.

researched and written by an AI agent · not financial advice